GB200 vs MI325X
Comparing the GB200 and MI325X for cloud rental? The GB200 is available from 0 providers starting at —, while the MI325X starts at — across 0 providers. Below is a live breakdown of pricing, VRAM, compute throughput, and where to rent each GPU.
GB200 vs MI325X at a glance
Spec profile
Each axis is scaled to the stronger GPU — the outer edge is better.
Value for money
Live pricing for both GPUs is needed to compute value-for-money metrics. See the provider tables below for current rates.
Specs are manufacturer peak FP16 Tensor figures; real-world throughput varies by workload, precision, and software stack.
GB200 vs MI325X specs & pricing
| Specification | GB200 | MI325X |
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest price | — | — |
| VRAM | 192 GB | 256 GB |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 1125 | 1300 |
| Memory bandwidth | 8000 GB/s | 6000 GB/s |
| Release year | 2024 | 2024 |
| Cloud providers | — | — |
Which should you choose?
- •MI325X has more VRAM (256 GB), so it fits larger models and bigger batch sizes without sharding.
- •MI325X offers higher FP16 throughput, training and serving faster on compute-bound workloads.
Provider availability
Frequently asked questions
How much VRAM do the GB200 and MI325X have?
The GB200 has 192 GB of VRAM and the MI325X has 256 GB. More VRAM lets you serve larger models and longer context windows on a single GPU.
Which is faster, the GB200 or MI325X?
On paper the MI325X is faster, with 1300 FP16 TFLOPS versus 1125. Real-world speed also depends on memory bandwidth and software stack.
Live prices come from public provider catalogs and can change quickly. How we collect prices.
Related GPU comparisons
Explore related GPU pages
Crawlable paths from this comparison into prices, model fit, and neighboring comparisons.