GH200 vs A40
Comparing the GH200 and A40 for cloud rental? The GH200 is available from 0 providers starting at —, while the A40 starts at — across 0 providers. Below is a live breakdown of pricing, VRAM, compute throughput, and where to rent each GPU.
GH200 vs A40 at a glance
Spec profile
Each axis is scaled to the stronger GPU — the outer edge is better.
Value for money
Live pricing for both GPUs is needed to compute value-for-money metrics. See the provider tables below for current rates.
Specs are manufacturer peak FP16 Tensor figures; real-world throughput varies by workload, precision, and software stack.
GH200 vs A40 specs & pricing
| Specification | GH200 | A40 |
|---|---|---|
| Cheapest price | — | — |
| VRAM | 96 GB | 48 GB |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 495 | 150 |
| Memory bandwidth | 4000 GB/s | 696 GB/s |
| Release year | 2023 | 2021 |
| Cloud providers | — | — |
Which should you choose?
- •GH200 has more VRAM (96 GB), so it fits larger models and bigger batch sizes without sharding.
- •GH200 offers higher FP16 throughput, training and serving faster on compute-bound workloads.
Provider availability
Frequently asked questions
How much VRAM do the GH200 and A40 have?
The GH200 has 96 GB of VRAM and the A40 has 48 GB. More VRAM lets you serve larger models and longer context windows on a single GPU.
Which is faster, the GH200 or A40?
On paper the GH200 is faster, with 495 FP16 TFLOPS versus 150. Real-world speed also depends on memory bandwidth and software stack.
Live prices come from public provider catalogs and can change quickly. How we collect prices.
Related GPU comparisons
Explore related GPU pages
Crawlable paths from this comparison into prices, model fit, and neighboring comparisons.